Over the last few days, there have been a number of news stories on the Evergrande issue in China. Evergrande is a large property developer in China which has been facing financial difficulties with possibility of default on its debt.
There have been questions like whether it is China's 'Lehman moment' meaning just as the collapse of Lehman Brothers triggered the Great Financial Crisis of 2008-9 will this trigger something far bigger than a single company default? How much of an impact does the property market in China have on prices of materials, particularly Steel, around the world? Is there a cauae for worry for the Indian markets and investors?
In this piece are tried to dig a little deep into what these developments portend.
First off, how big a deal is that Evergrande has been having difficulties? To understand the context, China has been trying to clean up its bad corporate debts for years. The government has been making noises about more market discipline and a transparent process for letting firms default in order to prevent 'moral hazard'.
However, it has taken a caliberated approach for the same. The contrast can be seen in how it dealt with the large lender, Huarong which was facing problems and a possible default a couple of months ago. In that case since it was state owned and considered large & systemically important, the Chinese government essentially engineered a bailout and ensured there was no default.
The Evergrande issue is different. In our view, the Evergrande issue is part of a deliberate move by the Chinese Government to let a few businesses fail if needed, to rein in a bigger problem, so they will not let it go out of hand. The situation is similar to a "controlled detonation". In a relatively controlled economy like China, this is entirely possible.
Of course, for now, Evergrande has not defaulted on its onshore obligations which form the bulk of its debt. It has probably come to some kind of deal with them - the details of which have not been made public.
Plus, for all practical purposes, a default of Evergrande has already been priced in, and not just its own bonds - even overall High Yield bonds in China/ Asia have already reacted, so there's not much further downside there.
Besides, apart from real estate, tech and consumer discretionary, which have also been the subject of the Government crackdown, other parts of the Chinese economy, continue to be robust. That is where are placing our faith.
The primary casualty of the contagion, if any, will be the banking sector. As far as our global funds and portfolios are concerned, this is a sector we are anyway underweight.
In China, we are in sectors which are more robust like clean energy, semiconductors, footwear & chemicals. We have not taken any direct exposure to the finance and property sectors in China. We also cut out the consumer internet/ tech stocks a few months ago after the government pressure increased in various ways on companies like Alibaba, Tencent etc. The way the Chinese government forced the pulling of the Alibaba affiliate, Ant Financials' IPO and thereafter moved against several other consumer tech giants showed that regardless of business potential, the Chinese government would not let any entrepreneur get 'too big for their boots'.
On the other hand Chinese government has put a lot of effort and money behind many identified innovation and high tech areas from semiconductors to neuroscience to blockchain. Hence the opportunities have to be properly sifted and identified.
We will be watching the developments very closely, but one way or the other, it is not going to affect our global fund/ portfolio materially.
While we don’t think anyone realistically sees Evergrande as Lehman, but we’ve also seen these periods of China deleveraging weakness before and they aren’t fun. We don’t need the 0.01% probability tail event to be concerned. However, given the amount of publicity it has already received, property developers and financiers have already seen credit spreads widen. For Evergrande, effectively, a default risk is already built in with its bonds trading at 20-30 cents on the dollar.
Beijing wants to rein in the property sector which has been highly levered for some time now. But Beijing does not want consumers to suffer so the only solution is restructuring and a slow burn in the property sector. As of June, Evergrande's inventory (composed of largely unfinished projects) accounted for about 60% of its total assets. Properties under development, in particular, ballooned to 1.3 trillion yuan ($202 billion), a 54% jump from three years ago.
If only Evergrande could offload some of these projects to, say, a cash-rich state-owned enterprise, its immediate liquidity crunch would be resolved. Beijing would then have some breathing room to gradually scale down this beast.
While one can bet against Chinese private banks/NBFCs with high exposure to property related sectors, we don't think PBOC will let big banks collapse.
The other possible risk area is investment grade names in the real estate space. The Bloomberg China HY USD index is 66% real estate. Hence, when you look at the aggregate index, it is mostly a real estate picture you get.
So far, we think this a China real estate specific problem. The contagion is likely to be very limited.
This leads us to the question if a Chinese real estate/ property area problem has wider implications? Especially for metals and other industrial commodities.
Steel and iron ore are already under pressure due to Beijing's "Blue Skies" mission for winter Olympics where in order to reduce emissions they're restricting steel production. Iron ore is trading around $100-110, less than half of its May 2021 peak. Australian miners can take a big hit and they already are.
As for implications for Indian metal companies: Metals, including steel, had been big winners in our India portfolio from the third quarter of 2020 but we had started trimming these a few months ago - one reason being that we estimated that US would try to curb commodity inflation by strengthening the dollar which actually happened.
China has been curbing its own steel consumption for environmental and other reasons. However, I think the primary impact of this has been and will continue to be on iron ore prices and stocks - especially, Australian miners.
Indian steel stocks, while no longer the best bets in the market, don't appear particularly bad either. We however prefer non-ferrous metals both in India and globally.
Meanwhile, our systems continue to monitor all macro & market variables for all major economies as well as industry level data and like a Hare we remain alert, scanning the environment and ready to change direction if the situation so warrants.
As of now, we are not worried about contagion from this particular event but we continue to monitor potential risks.
(A version of this article first appeared in The Economic Times)
From the desk of
If you want any help at all in your wealth creation journey, in managing your Investments, just drop us a line via this link and we will be right by your side, super quick!
Or WhatsApp us on +91 88501 69753
Economists Think Dollar's Fall May Explain the Recent ‘Rally’ by Steve Liesman
Einstein taught us about relativity in nature. Now come Devina Mehra and Shankar Sharma of First Global to teach us about relativity in financial markets -- and raise some serious questions about just what is driving stock prices.
First Global reports are quite credible and, on occasion, more than that.
What prompts this mention is Intel's earnings report and the fact that First Global has had a pretty good bead on the company and its stock.
AMD up again following First Global upgrade to ‘buy’ (AMD) By Tomi Kilgore
Analyst Kuldeep Koul at First Global upgraded Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) to "buy" from "outperform," given the "exceptional traction" that the chipmaker's Opteron line of processors has been able to get.
Baidu Climbs on First Global’s ‘Outperform’ Outlook
Baidu Inc., the operator of China’s most-used Internet search engine, rose to the highest price in two weeks after First Global rated the shares “outperform? in new coverage.
Personality counts: Walmart's frugal, but Target charms
"It's better to take a slight hit on [profit] margins and keep on moving and inventing," says First Global Securities. And at least for now, Target is inventing in a way that appeals to consumers with money to spend.
At 11 times trailing earnings, Energizer is cheaper; Gillette's multiple is 25. But cheaper doesn't mean better, says First Global.
Bipinchandra Dugam @bipinchandra90
invested in both GFF-GTS and Super I50. Thank you very much for such wonderful investing experience with completely new approach. In my 15years of investing first product I felt which close to what customer want.
Shishir Kapadia @shishirkapadia1
by far you are the best, I have not come across transparency, acumen, global expertise, exposure, protection of capital, delivering return from any fund/ fund managers. Invested very small size in 3 products will keep on increasing it over the period
Copyright 2019, All Rights Reserved. Developed By : Hvantage Technologies Inc.