Ever heard of Dhyan Chand?
For the sake of our millennial readers, let’s do a quick bio of Dhyan Chand - the hockey equivalent of cricketing legend Sir Donald Bradman:
Dhyan Chand scored 14 goals at the 1928 Amsterdam Olympics. He was hailed as a ‘magician of hockey’ by newspapers. So astonishing was his stickwork that the Netherlands’ hockey authorities are believed to have broken his hockey stick to investigate whether there was a magnet inside it. After India’s win at the 1936 Berlin Olympics, Hitler offered Dhyan Chand, a German citizenship!
Believe it or not, India and Pakistan were Kings of the Field Hockey heap, from the '20s to the '70s. They reigned supreme. India beat America 26-0 in the Olympics, a world record.
The sub-continent teams' fluid passes, superb dribbling and bewitching stick-work ran circles around the Western and Australian teams, enthralling crowds worldwide.
And then, one sudden day, India and Pakistan became part of the rubbish heap.
The Developed nations struck back: they changed the field of play. Literally. Through Astroturf Technology.
This technology innovation changed hockey forever.
Astroturf offered a flat terrain, allowing fast passes with precise ball control. Because the speed of ball travel went up massively, reaching the ball in time, to convert passes, became critical. Therefore, fast sprinting speed became absolutely essential. This meant extreme fitness.
No prizes for guessing which players were fitter: the Developed nations! There were Western hockey players who could run the 100 m in under 11 seconds!
To add to this, their superb fitness was the result of superior training and nutrition tech. Precise video recordings, unheard of in India, were brought to play. Kinesiology, the Science of Movement, came in (Sydney University led at this); Time-release nutrition became the order of the day.
So at all levels of the game, from grass to training to nutrition, deep science and tech took away the edge that the "traditional" players enjoyed. They were simply out-muscled and out-gunned in this tech arms race. They didn't stand a chance.
The Traditionals became history.
Sport after sport has gone that way. Remember Tennis legend Bjorn Borg making a comeback with his comfort wooden racket, in face of Titanium rackets, and beating a retreat, never to be seen again on a tennis court?
Sensors in active wear allow players to measure their breathing, heart rate, temperature and hydration in real time.
Then there are GPS and lasers that measure exact positions, acceleration, distance and velocity, moulding players’ movements and speed to the desired targets. An elite cyclist only needs a pair of heads-up display glasses to record cycling information and make adjustments mid-ride. Swimmers utilize sensors to capture dive angle, leg movement, rotational speed and hydrodynamics.
Being faster by a few milliseconds can mean winning the Olympic gold.
Investment Management going the way of Sport?
Extremely advanced tech is doing to investment management, what it did to sport.
Traditionally, investment decisions sprung only and only from the human mind. Back then, if you put your money in a mutual fund or PMS scheme, your "human" fund manager painstakingly analysed Company and industry data in order to decide where to invest.
Think Warren Buffet and Peter Lynch.
They still do. They attend conference calls. They read annual reports (at least you hope they do!).
Almost all investment management practices today, remain frozen in a 1940s-1990s time warp.
It's all touchy-feely old school...still.
But there is seismic change afoot.
Advanced computing power via the cloud is bringing extreme data crunching prowess to a group of investment-techheads.
There are mathematical models that dispense insights at speeds unimaginable in the past. They can analyse more securities AND more data points in each than is possible even for large teams of humans.
Machines do the thinking for you. Machines "learn", mostly quicker and better than humans ever can.
Adaptive learning systems can replicate human inventiveness, only much better.
Artificial intelligence & Machine Learning are set to transform portfolio management. Some forward thinking Portfolio management services companies are training machine learning models to automate various aspects of trading and investing.
An expertly constructed Quant ML model can do bewildering things: it can read millions of research papers, balance sheets, conference call transcripts, social media feeds!
It can analyse a company's auditor's reports and management commentary. It can distinguish between good accounting policies and bad.
It can granularly analyse ratios, in time series as well as cross section, across thousands of companies.
A well developed machine can expertly analyse reams of data, discern patterns & linkages, across stocks and securities across the world. No set of humans is equipped to cast such a wide and narrow eye, contemporaneously, on data.
For example, at First Global, we have developed a System called the FG- Agreement in Motion. This system, a part of our larger Investment Tech stack, called the ExoTech, looks for areas of maximum "agreement" or consensus, across the world. By doing this, one can understand how the world's thinking on various things is converging or diverging. This sets up very interesting trades.
Can any humans ever do this?
Very few humans, if any at all, have the compound skills that being a successful investor needs.
Investing, the way it has been done so far, is nothing but luck masquerading as skill, with most gains coming from just a handful of stocks. As Charlie Munger says: "If you take away our few big winners, Berkshire's record is very mediocre".
This, in mathematical terms, is luck. Not skill.
Machines reduce the role of luck hugely, bringing skill to the fore.
Which is exactly why the traditional investment management business worldwide has been in crisis for years - because traditional fund management simply cannot beat markets, owing to their severe cognitive limitations.
Human beings are many things but they are almost never consistent. Their world view keeps changing depending on their own circumstances.
Machines are consistent. They will look at data with an even, un-jaundiced eye.
And this, in turn, translates into consistent market beating performance which the traditional fund managers simply cannot match, because of their biases, and inherent inability to process and comprehend vast amounts of data.
One of the more interesting aspects of quantitative investing is – the more the data fed into machines, the more accurate predictions they generate. This is absolutely the opposite in humans! Most human brains decline in capabilities, with age and load.
Very interestingly, because humans can process only limited data, they tend to build more concentrated, clustered portfolios, largely around their comfort zones. This increases correlation in the portfolio, leading to very volatile returns. Warren Buffett's Sharpe Ratio is just around 0.6-0.7. This would get any normal fund manager fired!
In contrast, Machines can build far larger, more carefully diversified portfolios, across a wide spectrum of securities: this approach reduces correlation, thereby reducing Risk, while not sacrificing returns.
Reality is: humans have limited capacity to absorb data and when confronted with vast amounts of data the human brain simply shuts down and resorts to "armchair thinking": wherein it forms reliance on underanalysed, oversimplified lazy opinions and simple stories.
Quantitative Investing is free from behavioural biases and emotions. The human mind, no matter how intellectually sound, cannot be emotionless.
As Daniel Kahneman, Nobel Laureate, who has written the seminal book on human biases says "Humans are simply incapable of giving up on their biases. Even I can't"
The Machines are coming to the Investing Game.
And Traditional Investing will go the way of Field Hockey.
Make no mistake.
(A version of this article first appeared in The Economic Times)
From the desk of
Devina Mehra & Shankar Sharma
If you want any help at all in your wealth creation journey, in managing your Investments, just drop us a line via this link and we will be right by your side, super quick!
Or WhatsApp us on +91 88501 69753
Economists Think Dollar's Fall May Explain the Recent ‘Rally’ by Steve Liesman
Einstein taught us about relativity in nature. Now come Devina Mehra and Shankar Sharma of First Global to teach us about relativity in financial markets -- and raise some serious questions about just what is driving stock prices.
The Alchemist of Dalal Street Shankar Sharma has an eye that is quick to spot seemingly junk shares that eventually turn out to be gold.
Never underestimate the importance of pragmatism, Sharma says. “Don’t get emotional about investments. It’s all about timing; enter and exit an investments at the appropriate time."
First Global reports are quite credible and, on occasion, more than that.
What prompts this mention is Intel's earnings report and the fact that First Global has had a pretty good bead on the company and its stock.
AMD up again following First Global upgrade to ‘buy’ (AMD) By Tomi Kilgore
Analyst Kuldeep Koul at First Global upgraded Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) to "buy" from "outperform," given the "exceptional traction" that the chipmaker's Opteron line of processors has been able to get.
Baidu Climbs on First Global’s ‘Outperform’ Outlook
Baidu Inc., the operator of China’s most-used Internet search engine, rose to the highest price in two weeks after First Global rated the shares “outperform? in new coverage.
Personality counts: Walmart's frugal, but Target charms
"It's better to take a slight hit on [profit] margins and keep on moving and inventing," says First Global Securities. And at least for now, Target is inventing in a way that appeals to consumers with money to spend.
At 11 times trailing earnings, Energizer is cheaper; Gillette's multiple is 25. But cheaper doesn't mean better, says First Global.
Copyright 2019, All Rights Reserved. Developed By : Hvantage Technologies Inc.